Um estudo sobre o agravo interno no tribunal de justiça do Paraná: os poderes dados ao relator, alegações errôneas encaminhadas ao colegiado e seus efeitos contra o recorrente

Abstract

The object of the present study starts with three fundamental ideas, working in a methodological and deductive approach: the internal appeal (inside courts) as an appeal, the powers of rappourteur to monocratically decide and the precedents of manifestly inadmissible or unfounded internal appeals that were applied the monetary fine and processual penalty verified by the “Código de Processo Civil”. When state courts began to acknowledge the internal appeal as an appealing source, having it been defined as manifestly inadmissible or unfound was a certain sign to the appeal for being uphold and applied the monetary fine and penalty already mentioned. Searching for bibliography here to be mentioned, appeared that the Court of Justice of Paraná acts with caution and leniently when sentencing the penalty predicted in the article 1.021 of “Código de Processo Civil”. What remains is to delineate the parameters of the court of what they understand as manifestly inadmissible and unfounded internal appealing.